Minimum alcohol pricing: cracking the proverbial walnut with a sledgehammer

You'll probably think that because we're a wine merchant and in the alcoholic drinks industry, we're instinctively against a minimum unit price (MUP). You'd have good reason to think it given the stink the Government's proposals have kicked up.

Yet you'd only be half right. Yes, wine merchants peddling mid-to-higher range wines ought to be delighted. The difference will turn out to be slight, but our wines shall seem more affordable relative to the wafer-thin margin wines sold in supermarkets. One merchant reckons it's a "win-win situation that will level the playing field"; another is "totally in favour"; both want the price set higher than the 45p suggested.

From a purely self-interested viewpoint, it's great. David remains completely unaffected (for instance, all our wines cost more than the proposed baseline), while Goliath (with his 80 per cent market share) gets shafted.

However, having considered it at length, I can't support this policy. Firstly, I just don't believe governments should be setting prices like this, and I am not in the slightest a libertarian. Yet that in itself is not a reason to oppose it. What matters most is that there is little evidence to suggest the minimum alcohol price policy will do what it is supposed to do. That makes it a bad law, and bad laws should not be on the statute book.

The Adam Smith Institute has produced a helpful paper critiquing the methodology behind the policy. Caveat emptor, the ASI comes with its own dogmatic baggage as a strident proponent of the free market from an academic and not altogether always practical standpoint. Of course they would oppose this. Yet their analysis is compelling and worth reading, at least in summary.

Essentially, they attack the utility of the Sheffield Alcohol Policy Model (SAPM), a computer model developed by the University of Sheffield, for providing "false" and "unreasonable assumptions" and ignoring "statistical error" and certain policy outcomes.

I was previously a management consultant specialising in pricing, so I'm not fazed by a price-demand curve. I also know that a computer model is only as good as the statistics feeding it and the assumptions coded into it. Have a look at the ASI's analysis and decide for yourself; but for my part, I am nervous about the SAPM being used as the basis for this scope of policymaking.

The health lobby is in favour of MUP because doctors and other healthcare professionals believe it will reduce incidence of alcohol-related diseases. I do not presume to second-guess doctors about a subject they are far more familiar with than me. However, real-life statistics do not bear this assumption out.

According to the ASI, the SAPM stated that at certain MUP levels, with consequent drops in consumption (based on flawed price sensitivity assumptions) disease would reduce at a certain rate per year from 2006 levels. However, since 2006 alcohol consumption has fallen in this country at a rate that according to the SAPM is equivalent to that produced by a MUP of 70p. Alcohol-related diseases have not fallen with it.

The consumption-disease argument is a fallacy. Campaigners presume that an overall fall in average consumption will reduce disease. Yet this is a policy prescription akin to cracking the proverbial walnut with a sledgehammer. The true problem is more nuanced than that.

Overall alcohol consumption is barely more now than what it was in 1980. What's more, it has been on a steady decline for much of the last decade, including among younger age groups.

Health and social policy has to be far more targeted at problem drinkers. Price is a powerful mechanism, but not for someone in the grip of alcohol dependency. Forty per cent of alcohol in this country is drunk by ten per cent of the population. Why penalise the other ninety per cent?

There is a valid argument, put to me today, that this will address the anti-social side of drinking, the 'pre-loading' and binge drinking that does indeed mar so much of modern Britain on a Friday or Saturday night. Pubs might benefit as their drinks look relatively more affordable compared to a supermarket's crate of lager cheaper than mineral water. Make a 2-litre bottle of white cider more expensive and perhaps our bingers shall conduct their proclivities with less abandon and more taste, or something to that effect. So it might. Yet with or without minimum pricing, a vodka & Red Bull made from filthy supermarket own-brand vodka and a gloopy energy drink is always going to be less expensive than one mixed up in a night club.

To top it off, the whole policy is illegal under EU law, as the Scottish government is discovering to its irritation. The EU has over the years mushroomed into a many-headed hydra. Yet it is at its heart a free trade area.

So where to go from here? We know that alcohol is a real problem in certain parts of Britain and among certain demographics at certain times. Alcohol-related illness and alcohol-induced anti-social behaviour create massive disruption and enormous costs for the NHS, the police and corollary public services. Too often does the maniacal 'something must be done' mentality hold sway today, but in this situation then evidently something must indeed be done.

The price mechanism is a blunt tool for fixing such a complex problem that crosses multiple sectors of public policy and government departments. Yet if the Government is set on fixing prices, why do it through a MUP that hands more profits to big retailers? Instead, why not consider simplifying and streamlining alcohol duty across product verticals and according to alcoholic strength, and in so doing set a floor price that way? Make duty flatter and cheaper but still insist on basic prices for alcohol and spend the revenue generated on supply-side alcohol strategies (such as education and prevention) and healthcare.

Fundamentally, this would be a bad law based on weak policy based on flawed methodologies. And as tempting as it might be to support it out of self-interest in the short-run, bad law begets bad law.

Comments 221

Angelina on

What do you study? trazodone 15 mg JPMorgan has also faced additional pressure from a powermarket manipulation scandal in California and the Midwest, withreports suggesting the bank will soon pay a near record $410million settlement with the U.S. Federal Energy RegulatoryCommission (FERC).

Roosevelt on

Excellent work, Nice Design desyrel zoloft Leading conservatives have sworn to stand by their campaign promise not to increase taxes. The SPD campaigned on a platform of tax hikes for top earners to fund improvements in infrastructure and education.

Jerry on

I really like swimming buy provera Because the throwback jersey and the Bucs’ current color scheme (pewter and white helmets) are so different, the team said it had no choice. They could put a Bucco Bruce decal on their current pewter helmets — the NFL doesn’t want players to change helmets after they’ve already been fitted for them — but are too fashion concious to wear mismatched uniforms.

Barton on

I’d like to pay this in, please buy provera online 24hr Livemodding challenge endtered its last stage, while German Casemod Championship, in which participants from all over the world will compete for the title of champion case modification designer. Voting among general members of public will determine the result. Cosplay Village and Gamescom congress held smaller events throughout the day.

Efren on

Hold the line, please Cholesterol Zetia NEW YORK – Billionaire investor Steven A. Cohen’s hedge fund pleaded not guilty on Friday to insider trading charges in federal court, as investors in the roughly $15 billion fund awaited word on plans for the fund’s future.

Kristopher on

How long are you planning to stay here? Zetia Hair Loss The Bank of England keeps on reassuring U.K. businesses that interest rates are set to stay at record lows until at least 2016. Markets suggest investors think the big day will come much sooner. But as long as the high street seems steady and the economy reasonably robust, that may not be such a big deal for the central bank.

Marty on

I’m a partner in doxycycline hyclate 100 mg Gyssling and the Nazis wielded such power big studios complied even as the German market withered, because they feared they wouldn’t be allowed back when the economy improved. The movie producers’ courage only returned when the ongoing war threatened distribution in England and France, two other big foreign markets.

Diego on

Have you got a telephone directory? doxycycline 100 mg capsule According to website Gawker, Robertson said to co-host Terry Meeuwsen on Tuesday’s “700 Club” “You know what they do in San Francisco, some in the gay community there, they want to get people so if they got (AIDS) they’ll have a ring, you shake hands, and the ring’s got a little thing where you cut your finger. Really. It’s that kind of vicious stuff, which would be the equivalent of murder.”

Solomon on

What sort of music do you listen to? bactrim 500 mg That Will had his own source and had been monitoring the same story this whole time—while purposefully being kept out of the loop by his own team—effectively undid his value as a Red Team “fresh eyes” scrutinizer, but also confirmed the possibility that this all actually happened. If anyone’s got a mind for plausibility, it’s Will, especially now that he seems to be moving past the need for viewer acceptance. But a degree of his support for Mac and Charlie could have been influenced by having prior knowledge, thanks to this unknown “better than POTUS” source of his. Imagine if he’d truly come in without any exposure to the scandal whatsoever—his reaction would’ve been like Jim’s, but multiplied by 10 billion. He’d have sussed out the doctored interview footage, fired Dantana, and been home in time to spark a J and take in the Berkeley-UCLA game. Ultimately, though, being up to speed with the rest of the gang puts just as much blame on his shoulders for this “institutional failure,” and even though it’s a potentially career-ending situation, it further endears him to the people in his life who actually care about him on a personal level. 

Brice on

I came here to study abilify coupon In Thursday’s filing, the first public disclosure of financial figures, Twitter reported that revenue almost tripled to $316.9 million in 2012. In the first half of 2013, it posted revenue of $253.6 million but had a loss of $69.3 million.

Tracey on

Have you read any good books lately? cheap abilify My Mother ended in in one of those places with dementia. The family had no choice in this decision and it was forced upon us by the NHS. Over the next 3 years they took her pension, house and most of her belongings to fund her care. If I end up with that desease I will commit some major crime and spend my last years in the care of the prison service.

Kayla on

Could I take your name and number, please? abilify generic “From the very beginning of the business Fortnum’s used to produce readymade dishes like pork pies for travellers, which were put in baskets with disposable bamboo cutlery,” says Dr Andrea Tanner, the shop’s archivist. “The Scotch egg was one of those foods. It was small enough to fit in a handkerchief or pocket, and maybe was rather less smelly than tucking into a hardboiled egg on a coach.”

Seth on

Not available at the moment zofran iv The Regional Bureau of the UNAIDS in West and Central Africa brought together members of the Africa Media Network against AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (REMASTP) and other actors on the response to HIV, in Ivory Coast, from the 8th-11th July 2013, to facilitate communication on their different experiences and to enhance the work of the media on the issue.

Lamont on

I’m self-employed abilify 10 mg tablet medicijnen On Sunday, this Giants team didn’t ever look capable of taking over at all. Several players — including Tuck and Rolle — mentioned that the Giants simply needed a “spark,” that they needed that one play to get them going, to snap them out of a 2013 that has been a bad dream.

Cecil on

An accountancy practice ondansetron tablets Alan Taylor was picked in the same category for “The Internal Enemy: Slavery and War in Virginia, 1772-1832,” and Lawrence Wright was named for “Going Clear: Scientology, Hollywood, & the Prison of Belief.”

Leave a comment

Read more